Page 16 - NBIZ December 2023
P. 16

Key Objective





         Metrics








                         Making the Best

              to         Hiring Decisions &


                         Avoiding Costly


                         Hiring Mistakes









          By Michelle Caspole


                               ith gratitude, my company           Another department we ran the names through
                               celebrated our 25th year in      was accounts receivable as bottom performers usually
                               business and are still going     show up there in the form of excessive credits, late
                               strong! Our core focus is        payments, and returned goods due to poor sales rep-
                               helping executives avoid costly   resentatives. Once we had those names, and we tested
           Whiring mistakes at the  point                       them using the PXT Select, we could begin to see deltas
        of selection. As a former VP of Sales at small division of   that would help identify traits essential to success and
        DuPont, and later Revlon, I found myself constantly rely-  traits that appear to be barriers to success. Here is an
        ing on gut feel to hire B2B salespeople, sales managers,   example of what we found. (See top right visual on
        and other key revenue driving roles. Often, I was under   following page)
        pressure to fill the territory and “the following the gut    Thinking Style represents their ability to solve
        method” worked less than 50% of the time for me.        problems, speed to learn, cognitive agility, and more. It’s
            As with many sales managers, I found myself spend-  a constant and does not change much over time. In this
        ing over half my time trying to make underachieving     chart, the green numbers represent the distribution of
        sales people get to average at the cost of working with   the top performers and red represents distribution of
        my best people. I hung on to the low performers for far   bottom performers.
        too long and it impacted my effectiveness as a leader.     It’s a small company with less than 15 sales people
        If you have this same challenge in sales or other key   so we layered their data on our national benchmark in
        departments in your company, here is how to cut those   that job category. The assessment is normed so 8-10
        mistakes in half.                                       represents the upper 16% of the population, 4-7 is middle
            After studying the cognitive behaviors and motiva-  68% and 1-3 is the lower 16%. 
        tional interests of both our top and bottom performers in    Here we quickly see that the job requires higher
        job categories, as a company we were able to note what   scores in thinking style. Simply put, one can see that if
        were the differences between the groups. We looked for   the scores fall below the shaded blue zone (benchmark),
        clusters of scores in the top and outliers in the bottom   the employee or potential candidate is underqualified
        group. It was critical to have agreement on who were top   and no amount of training will likely compensate for
        and who were bottom. Often, CEOs are aware of this, but   that. In this case, the numeric reasoning delta is very
        sales managers sometimes have a hard time with it as    big and that is almost impossible to detect in the normal
        they are too close to the problem and friendly to all.   interview. One must test for this.

        16 NBIZ  ■ December 2023
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18