Page 15 - August 2022
P. 15

tenant. Under this option, the land-  a “landlord is not required to simply   avoided” However, a landlord’s failure
        lord can recover the actual rental   fill the premises with any willing   to mitigate does not give rise to a
        reduced by the amount to be received   tenant; the replacement tenant must   cause of action by a tenant.
        from the new tenant;                be suitable under the circumstances”.
           4) Forfeiture: the landlord may   A landlord’s failure to mitigate    “Objectively Reasonable” Efforts
        declare the lease forfeited. Under this   damages will prevent recovery by a   The duty to mitigate damages
        option, the landlord relieved the tenant   landlord “only to the extent that the   requires that a landlord use “objectively
        of liability for future rental payments.  damages reasonably could have been   reasonable” efforts to fill the leased

        Landlord’s Most Powerful Remedy
           Under Texas law, a landlord may
        elect to treat the tenant’s default and
        conduct as an anticipatory breach of
        contract and repossess and retain the
        leased premise for personal purposes
        when a tenant breaches a lease
        agreement by abandoning the leased
        premises and failing to pay monthly         EMPLOYER
        rent. Speedee Mart, Inc. v. Stovall, 664    BENEFIT SERVICES
        S.W.2d 174, 177 (Tex.App.–Amarillo
        1983, no writ). Under this election,
        the landlord is entitled to recover
        the present value of all rentals that
        accrue under the lease agreement, re-
        duced by the reasonable cash market
        value of the lease agreement for the
        unexpired term. This long-standing
        court decision held that the proper               PLAN              PAYROLL            BENEFIT
        calculation should be future rents          ADMINISTRATION       MANAGEMENT            PACKAGE
        from the time of the breach to the end       Assistance and research   Get your employees   MARKETING
        of the lease agreement reduced to its         to keep you informed   paid quickly so you   Document
        present value, and then further re-          and in compliance with   can get back to doing   administration of
                                                                                             401(k) and 403(b)
        duced by the reasonable cash market          state and federal laws.  what your company   including employee
                                                                            does best.
        value of the lease agreement for the                                                enrollment assistance.
        unexpired term. This remedy is most
        often found in the lease contract and
        highly recommended when a tenant
        commits an anticipatory breach.

        Landlord’s Duty to Mitigate
        Damages
           In an action to recover damages
        for a tenant’s anticipatory breach of
                                                                            HUMAN
                                                         CLAIMS
                                                                                               BENEFITS
        the lease, a landlord is required to          MANAGEMENT          RESOURCES        EDUCATION AND
        make reasonable efforts to mitigate                               CONSULTING         CONSULTING
                                                        When a claim is
        its damages when a tenant breaches            made, we assist in the   Develop policies and   Cra  a competitive

        the lease and abandons the property.          process, from the first   procedures, address   employee benefits plan
        TEX. PROP.CODE ANN. §91.006                  filing of the claim to its   recruiting strategies,   to recruit and retain
        (Vernon 2007); See also Austin Hill              resolution.   develop job descriptions.  valuable employees.
        Country Realty, Inc. v. Palisades
        Plaza, Inc., 948 S.W.2d 293, 299-300
        (Tex.1997); See also Cole Chem. &                                       PUTTING ALL THE HEALTHCARE
        Distrib., Inc. v. Gowing, 228 S.W.3d                                         BENEFIT PIECES TOGETHER
        684, 687-88 (Tex.App.–Houston
        [14  Dist.] 2005, no pet). Mitigation,                                   OFFICE       ONLINE
           th
                                                                                 713-647-9700
                                                                                              www.corebenefits.net
        however, is not an absolute duty. The
        Texas Supreme Court has stated that
                                                                                                   NBIZ  ■ August 2022  15
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20