Page 23 - NBIZ October 2021
P. 23

of the investment models do not     demand systems and identify those      Steps one and two are items that
        consider the likelihood and intensity   systems that are considered a critical   building managers routinely work on;
        of extreme weather and/or its impact   load versus those that can be turned   the key differences in this framework
        on business continuity.             off or ramped down. Figure 4 on the   are steps three and four. Both steps
                                            following page, indicates an example   require building managers to assess
        Power Resilience Planning           of the change in power demand at an   current and future weather risk and
        Framework                           industrial facility based on various   the potential likelihood of disruptions
           HARC (harcresearch.org) has      operational scenarios.              due to these risks. It is important to
        developed the resilience planning
        framework, seen in figure 3, to better
        assess and design tailored micro-
        grids that meet cost-efficiency and
        resilience requirements. The goal for
        this framework is for an organiza-
        tion to develop a plan to understand
        their outage risks and support the
        design process of a resilient microg-
        rid to mitigate those risks.
           This framework incorporates the
        load lost due to the power outages,
        the risk of power outages due to
        climate change, and the cost of
        deploying a microgrid resilient to
        power outages.
           The framework walks a facility
        manager through eight steps to
        determine the opportunity to deploy
        a resilient power grid. The first step,
        critical to any decision around on-
        site generation, is to make energy
        efficiency improvements. Energy
        efficiency measures will lessen
        the overall power demand at a site
        resulting in less power to be provid-
        ed by the utility or the microgrid.
        The result is lower overall operating
        costs. HARC has developed a com-
        mercial energy efficiency assessment
        tool (https://energyfinancing.har-
        cresearch.org/) located on the Texas
        Energy Hub (https://energyhub.
        harcresearch.org/) to help building
        owners determine their best options
        for energy efficiency.
           Once through the energy
        efficiency measures, the facility
        manager will go through a four-step
        process to determine the risk of
        an outage and the costs associated
        with these risks. The key to this is
        determining the power demand of
        the site, considering not just min-
        imum or maximum power demand
        but also assessing the most frequent
        power demand scenarios. Another
        crucial point is to identify the
        energy sub-systems or key energy

                                                                                                  NBIZ  ■ October 2021  23
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26